<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ramos Law Firm Workers&#039; Comp Blog &#187; attorney fees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ramoslawblog.com/tag/attorney-fees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com</link>
	<description>Your Questions about Georgia Workers&#039; Compensation Answered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Appellate Division defines “litigation expenses and fees”</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/01/20/appellate-division-defines-%e2%80%9clitigation-expenses-and-fees%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/01/20/appellate-division-defines-%e2%80%9clitigation-expenses-and-fees%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Lindsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O.C.G.A § 34-9-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent appeal before the  Workers Compensation Appellate Division, an employee argued that an ALJ erred in  assessing paralegal expenses as a litigation cost.  Pursuant to O.C.G.A. §  34-9-108(b)(4),<span id="more-240"></span> the Code limits reasonable litigation expenses to witness fees  and mileage pursuant to Code Section 24-10-24; reasonable expert witness fees  subject to the fee schedule; reasonable deposition transcript cost; and the cost  of the hearing transcripts.  After reviewing the Code section, the Court  determined that paralegal time is not a reasonable litigation expense as defined  under O.C.G.A. § 34-9-108(b)(4).</p>
<p>In the same appeal, the employee  also argued that there was no basis to award a fee for the employee&#8217;s failure to  attend an independent medical examination.  The Court found that O.C.G.A. §  34-9-108 allows for the reimbursement of reasonable litigation expenses, which  includes witness and expert witness fees.  Since O.C.G.A. § 34-9-102 states that  a medical report by an examining physician shall be admissible as evidence, then  the fee for the employee&#8217;s failure to attend the independent medical examination  was proper.  The Court concluded that the fee was a reasonable litigation  expense properly assessed against the employee since the fee was an expense  incurred by the employer for the purpose of obtaining a medical opinion from an  expert witness to be presented at the hearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/01/20/appellate-division-defines-%e2%80%9clitigation-expenses-and-fees%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can I Afford An Attorney to Represent Me in My WC Claim?</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/10/07/can-i-afford-an-attorney-to-represent-me-in-my-wc-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/10/07/can-i-afford-an-attorney-to-represent-me-in-my-wc-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adriana Sola Capifali</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia workers' compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O.C.G.A § 34-9-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many injured workers are concerned about how their attorney will get paid.<span> </span>In the field of workers’ compensation, claimant’s attorneys are generally paid on a contingency basis. <span> </span>The contingency fee structure ensures that injured workers, who do not have money to retain an attorney at the inception of a claim, are able to obtain legal representation.<span> </span>The attorney is paid only when the injured worker wins the case.<span> </span>In the event the injured worker loses the case for compensation, the attorney will generally not collect a fee.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Georgia Workers’ Compensation Act regulates the contingency fee an attorney can charge an injured worker.<span> </span>O.C.G.A. § 34-9-108(a) limits the percentage an attorney is permitted to charge to no more than 25% of weekly benefits or 25% of the final settlement amount.<span> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/10/07/can-i-afford-an-attorney-to-represent-me-in-my-wc-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

