<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ramos Law Firm Workers&#039; Comp Blog &#187; Subsequent Injury Trust Fund</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ramoslawblog.com/category/subsequent-injury-trust-fund/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com</link>
	<description>Your Questions about Georgia Workers&#039; Compensation Answered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New York Prepares to Close Second Injury Fund</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/03/03/new-york-prepares-to-close-second-injury-fund/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/03/03/new-york-prepares-to-close-second-injury-fund/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Lindsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsequent Injury Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>As of 07/01/07, the self-insured employers and the carriers in New York can no longer file claims for reimbursement with the Special Funds Conservation Committee under Section 15-8</strong>. In other words, for claims with dates of accident or dates of disablement of 07/01/07 or later,<span id="more-450"></span> the employers and carriers cannot look to the Special Funds Conservation Committee for reimbursement under Section 15-8 or Section 14-6, the concurrent employment provision.</p>
<p><strong>The recent law also provides that no C-250&#8242;s may be filed after 07/01/10, for claims with dates of accident or dates of disablement prior to 07/01/07, for the purpose of seeking 15-8 relief</strong>. Regardless of the filing dates of the C-250&#8242;s, again for claims prior to 07/01/07, all written submission of evidence in support of a 15-8 claim must be filed prior to 07/01/10 for consideration by the Special Funds Conservation Committee.</p>
<p>The Statute also requires that all requests for reimbursement for cases with established 15-8 or 14-6 findings be submitted to the Special Funds Conservation Committee <em>within one year</em> from the date of the expenditure or one year from the effective date of this legislation, 03/13/07, whichever is later. The reimbursement request would be deemed waived if the employers or the carriers do not comply with this provision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/03/03/new-york-prepares-to-close-second-injury-fund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second Injury Fund in North Carolina Still Active</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/02/27/second-injury-fund-in-north-carolina-still-active/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/02/27/second-injury-fund-in-north-carolina-still-active/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Lindsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsequent Injury Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work related injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>In North Carolina, the Industrial Commission disburses moneys from the Second Injury Fund.</strong> In order to qualify for compensation for a second injury, the original and the subsequent injury must be at least twenty percent (20%) of the entire body, and, the additional compensation cannot exceed<span id="more-452"></span> the amount which would have been payable for both injuries had both been sustained in the subsequent accident.</p>
<p><strong>The Fund may also pay compensation and medical expenses in cases of permanent and total disability resulting from an injury to the brain or spinal cord. </strong> In the claims that pertain to total and permanent disability due to paralysis or loss of mental capacity, the Fund may cover expenses related to medical, nursing, hospital, institutional, equipment, and other treatment expenses reasonable and necessary during the life of the injured employee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/02/27/second-injury-fund-in-north-carolina-still-active/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Types of Second-Injury Funds</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/02/19/types-of-second-injury-funds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/02/19/types-of-second-injury-funds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Lindsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Subsequent Injury Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The two major types of second-injury funds are reimbursement funds and take-over funds.</strong> In both of these situations, the employer/insurer can reduce liability when the fund becomes liable.<span id="more-454"></span></p>
<p><strong>States, such as Georgia and New York, which have reimbursement funds which actually reimburse the carrier for indemnity and medical benefits made to a claimant. </strong> The employer/insurer remains the primary claims handler and must request periodic reimbursements from the fund for payments made on the claim.  These funds will also take an active role in any settlement discussions.</p>
<p><strong>States which have take-over funds will pay the claimant directly once the liability has been determined.</strong> In New Jersey, for example, once the fund&#8217;s liability has been established, it can pay the claimant&#8217;s permanent and total benefits for the life of the claims.  The employer remains liable for the medical expenses.</p>
<p><strong>There are many active second-injury funds in the U.S.  Since many of them have different rules and regulations, strict attention must be paid to the statutory requirements for each state.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/02/19/types-of-second-injury-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts On The SITF</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/02/18/thoughts-on-the-sitf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/02/18/thoughts-on-the-sitf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Timmons, Jr.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsequent Injury Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia workers' compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work related injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the Georgia legislature now back in session, it makes me consider the fate of the SITF and its impending sunset.  <strong>While it does not appear that the legislature will consider any new measures for the SITF in this session, I would certainly wish<span id="more-419"></span> somehow that they would</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>The <a href="http://sitf.georgia.gov/02/sitf/home/0,2438,20194284,00.html" target="_blank">Subsequent Injury Trust Fund</a> (SITF) was created to keep Georgians at work.</strong> It provides a means by which employers can feel safe in taking a risk on hiring someone who has previously suffered a work-related injury.  <strong>Any injury or furtherance of the previous injury would not affect the employers&#8217; workers compensation insurance.</strong></p>
<p>Without the SITF, there are two major problems that will arise.  First, <strong>employers will not want to hire people who have been previously injured on the job</strong>.  This is due to a reluctance to possibly take on the medical expenses of the worker.  Second, <strong>once workers understand that they cannot be hired with pre-existing injuries, they will begin to lie about their pre-existing injuries in order to be hired</strong>.  This will cause a great deal of litigation over pre-existing injuries.</p>
<p>Particularly considering today&#8217;s economy, <strong>I think it&#8217;s a brutal blow to Georgia&#8217;s workforce for the SITF to be shutting its doors</strong>.  I would urge everyone to consider the ramifications of the SITF sunset and take action to contact legislatures and express how important a program like the SITF is to Georgia&#8217;s future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/02/18/thoughts-on-the-sitf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unprecedented growth Contributes to Closing of Georgia SITF</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/01/07/unprecedented-growth-contributes-to-closing-of-georgia-sitf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/01/07/unprecedented-growth-contributes-to-closing-of-georgia-sitf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Lindsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Subsequent Injury Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The unprecedented growth of the Georgia SITF over the past few years reportedly indicates growth of a substantial unfunded liability. These ever-rising liabilities, coupled with incentives to submit cases into the Fund and increasing assessments, have been a recipe for financial disaster that the Georgia Legislature has now addressed.<span id="more-143"></span></p>
<p>On July 1, 2006, the Georgia legislature closed the Subsequent Injury Trust Fund to new claims. There exists some misconception that the law now prevents any claims from being filed after June 30, 2006. However, the statute does not provide such, but instead provides that no claims shall be reimbursed for an injury occurring after June 30, 2006. Thus, any new injuries occurring on or before June 30, 2006 may still be submitted to SITF for a reimbursement agreement, in accordance with the statute and SITF rules.</p>
<p>Despite the fact that the SITF will be closing, the reality is that payments on accepted claims will continue to be paid by the Fund indefinitely. More importantly, all claims filed with the Fund since July 1, 1977 to present that have not been accepted by the Fund, must be perfected for acceptance or they&#8217;ll be automatically denied by the Fund on July 1, 2009.</p>
<p>Carriers and self-insureds will continue to pay required assessments to the SITF until June 30, 2008. Once all claims are resolved, the SITF will return any leftover funds to those assessed and complete the process of dissolving the Fund.</p>
<p>In recent years almost 20 states have eliminated their funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/01/07/unprecedented-growth-contributes-to-closing-of-georgia-sitf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are expenses incurred prior to 2003 reimbursable?</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/01/02/are-expenses-incurred-prior-to-2003-reimbursable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/01/02/are-expenses-incurred-prior-to-2003-reimbursable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Lindsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsequent Injury Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia workers' compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O.C.G.A § 34-9-]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2003 amendment to O.C.G.A. §  34-9-203, effective July 1, 2003, added paragraph (c)(4), imposing a one year  limitation period on the filing of reimbursement claims.  While this amendment  imposed a one year filing limitation <span id="more-244"></span>on all of the employee&#8217;s medical expenses  incurred after July 1, 2003, it did not affect those expenses incurred prior to  that date.  O.C.G.A. § 34-9-203 will not be applied retroactively to pre-2003  claims.  Therefore, any medical expenses or reimbursement claims incurred prior  to July 1, 2003 are not subject to the one year  limitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2009/01/02/are-expenses-incurred-prior-to-2003-reimbursable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benefits of Settling a Claim when the SITF is Involved…</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/11/13/benefits-of-settling-a-claim-when-the-sitf-is-involved%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/11/13/benefits-of-settling-a-claim-when-the-sitf-is-involved%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Lindsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsequent Injury Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Settlement may occur prior to OR following SITF acceptance of a claim. In the case where a claim is settled prior to SITF acceptance, SITF does not consider itself a party to the agreement and is not subject to its provisions.</p>
<p>When settlement negotiations are initiated during the evaluation process, SITF must be notified by the employer/insurer of any and all settlement demands. The employer/insurer must submit a Settlement Authority Request in writing. The settlement authority request must include <span id="more-145"></span>a full evaluation of the claim, including a determination of future expenses and totals paid for the medical and indemnity expenses at that time. The SITF also requires that the employer/insurer consider a Medicare Set-Aside provision. After its review, the fund will render a decision regarding the acceptability of the settlement.</p>
<p>If a settlement mediation conference is imminent, the fund must have complete information at least 21 days prior to the mediation date. This courtesy will allow the fund to make an informed assessment of the settlement request.</p>
<p>Considering that employers/insurers may be reimbursed for all weekly income benefits payable after 104 weeks, for 50% of all medical and rehabilitation expenses between $5,000 and $10,000, and for 100% of all medical and rehabilitation expenses in excess of $10,000, a large portion of a settlement agreement may be covered by the Subsequent Injury Trust Fund rather than out of the pockets of the employer/insured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/11/13/benefits-of-settling-a-claim-when-the-sitf-is-involved%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>23 Presumptive Medical Conditions</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/10/28/23-presumptive-medical-conditions-considered-a-hindrance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/10/28/23-presumptive-medical-conditions-considered-a-hindrance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Lindsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsequent Injury Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hindrance to employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O.C.G.A § 34-9-]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presumptive medical conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order for an employer/insured to be eligible for reimbursement from the Subsequent Injury Trust Fund, the employee’s subsequent injury must be directly caused by the prior impairment. The employer must show that this prior impairment was permanent and likely to be a hindrance to employment. Any pre-existing, permanent condition qualifies. The condition may be derived from an automobile accident, personal injury, or an acquired or congenital disease.</p>
<p>For some medical conditions, the Fund has defined them as presumptive conditions. In other words, the employer/insured need not provide documentation to prove that these medical conditions are permanent and a hindrance to employment. Pursuant to Section 34-9-361 of the Official Code of Georgia, the presumptive medical conditions are defined as permanent and a hindrance to employment.</p>
<p>The 23 presumptive medical conditions in O.C.G.A. § 34-9-361 are:<span id="more-140"></span></p>
<p>1. Epilepsy</p>
<p>2. Diabetes</p>
<p>3. Arthritis which is an obstacle or hindrance to employment or reemployment</p>
<p>4. Amputated foot, leg, arm or hand</p>
<p>5. Loss of sight of one or both eyes or a partial loss of uncorrected vision of more than 75 percent bilaterally</p>
<p>6. Residual disability from poliomyelitis</p>
<p>7. Cerebral palsy</p>
<p>8. Multiple sclerosis</p>
<p>9. Parkinson&#8217;s disease</p>
<p>10. Cardiovascular disorders</p>
<p>11. Tuberculosis</p>
<p>12. Mental retardation, provided the employee&#8217;s intelligence quotient (IQ) is such that he or she falls within the lowest two percent of the general population; provided, however, that it shall not be necessary for the employer to know the employee&#8217;s actual IQ or actual relative ranking in relation to the IQ of the general population.</p>
<p>13. Psychoneurotic disability following confinement for treatment in a recognized medical or mental institution for a period in excess of six months.</p>
<p>14. Hemophilia</p>
<p>15. Sickle cell anemia</p>
<p>16. Chronic osteomyelitis</p>
<p>17. Ankylosis of major weight bearing joints</p>
<p>18. Hyperinsulism</p>
<p>19. Muscular dystrophy</p>
<p>20. Total occupational loss of hearing as defined in Code Section 34-9-264</p>
<p>21. Compressed air sequelae</p>
<p>22. Ruptured intervertebral disc</p>
<p>23. Any permanent condition which, prior to the occurrence of the subsequent injury, constitutes a 20 percent impairment of a foot, leg, hand, or arm, or the body as a whole</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/10/28/23-presumptive-medical-conditions-considered-a-hindrance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who, What, and How will the Georgia SITF reimburse me?</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/10/13/who-what-and-how-will-the-georgia-sitf-reimburse-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/10/13/who-what-and-how-will-the-georgia-sitf-reimburse-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Lindsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Subsequent Injury Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any insurance company licensed in Georgia to issue workers&#8217; compensation policies or self-insured employer authorized by the State Board of Workers&#8217; Compensation is eligible to file a claim for potential reimbursement from the Subsequent Injury Trust Fund.  The employer/insurer should forward a letter to the fund stating a desire to actively pursue the claim.  The fund requires medical documentation of the prior and subsequent injuries and, where indicated, investigative reports supporting compensability.  In addition, the fund requires the statement of merger.</p>
<p>The employer/insurer files a claim for reimbursement directly with the fund.  The Fund investigates the claim to determine eligibility for reimbursement.  When a reimbursement agreement is reached between the Fund and the employer or insurer, it must be approved by the Sate Board of Workers’ Compensation.  If an agreement cannot be reached, either party may request a mediation conference or a hearing with the State Board of Workers’ Compensation.</p>
<p>Employers/insurers may be reimbursed for all weekly income benefits payable after 104 weeks, for 50% of all medical and rehabilitation expenses between $5,000 and $10,000, and for 100% of all medical and rehabilitation expenses in excess of $10,000.  If the subsequent injury was not caused by or related to a prior impairment, the reimbursement for medical expenses may be reduced or denied completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/10/13/who-what-and-how-will-the-georgia-sitf-reimburse-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Subsequent Injury Trust Fund?</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/10/06/what-is-the-subsequent-injury-trust-fund/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/10/06/what-is-the-subsequent-injury-trust-fund/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Lindsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Subsequent Injury Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Subsequent Injury Trust Fund was enacted in 1977 to reduce the impact of singularly-large-workers’ compensation claims in the event a worker with a disability, injured on the job, aggravates a pre-existing impairment. The fund helps workers with disabilities by providing employers, who are not subject to the American’s with Disabilities Act, with the incentives to hire or retain qualified workers with disabilities.  The fund also assists insured employers by keeping workers’ compensation premiums under control, and if an employer is self-insured, keeps the workers’ compensation exposure at the deductible levels.</p>
<p>In order for an employer/insured to be eligible for reimbursement from the Fund, the employee’s subsequent injury must be directly caused by the prior impairment, or combine with a prior impairment to create greater employer liability for lost time benefits and medical expenses.  In addition, the employee must have a preexisting impairment that the employer considered to be permanent and likely to be a hindrance to employment, and the employer must have knowledge of the prior impairment before the subsequent injury occurs. The law also contains a list of conditions which are presumed to be permanent and likely to be a hindrance to employment provided the employer can demonstrate knowledge prior to the subsequent injury.</p>
<p>While many states are closing their Funds similar to the Subsequent Injury Trust Fund, there are still a handful of them out there that are going strong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2008/10/06/what-is-the-subsequent-injury-trust-fund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

