<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ramos Law Firm Workers&#039; Comp Blog &#187; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ramoslawblog.com/category/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com</link>
	<description>Your Questions about Georgia Workers&#039; Compensation Answered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Teleconference Initiative</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2012/01/31/administrative-law-judge-alj-teleconference-initiative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2012/01/31/administrative-law-judge-alj-teleconference-initiative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change of physician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injured worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Board of Workers' Compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an effort to “expedite” the resolution of certain issues, the State Board of Workers’ Compensation has recently implemented a “conference call” vehicle to assist injured workers and insurers.</p>
<p>Essentially, attorneys may call the Board and request a conference call with the presiding administrative law judge (ALJ) assigned to the claim.  If there is no ALJ assigned to the case, the State Board of Workers’ Compensation will assign a case accordingly.  These ALJ’s are empowered to address the resolution of medical issues or other claims that have NOT been “controverted” by the Employer/Insurer.  The primary purpose of this vehicle is to reach an answer without an evidentiary hearing.  The Board has included issues such as problems obtaining medication prescribed by the authorized treating physician; payment of unpaid medical bills; or accidental suspension of benefits.  The Board also indicated that this conference call vehicle should NOT be used for change of physician requests or other issues where the submission of evidence is required.</p>
<p>If one party requests the conference call, the other party’s participation is mandatory unless otherwise excused by the presiding judge.  Once the conference call is scheduled and the parties are notified via email to initiate the call, failure to participate may result in monetary penalties.  The Board requires 24-hour prior notice and a valid reason to avoid potential sanctions.  The workers’ compensation board “encourages” all parties to work together with the judge’s calendar.</p>
<p>It is the Ramos Law Firm’s hope that this new vehicle will assist injured workers’ in securing prompt medical treatment or resolution of a pending issue in his or her workers’ compensation claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2012/01/31/administrative-law-judge-alj-teleconference-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workers’ Compensation Doctors. What’s the deal?</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/11/12/workers%e2%80%99-compensation-doctors-what%e2%80%99s-the-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/11/12/workers%e2%80%99-compensation-doctors-what%e2%80%99s-the-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 04:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have been injured on the job, the treating physician has been selected for you by the workers’ compensation insurance company.   It is not uncommon for these physicians to communicate with the<span id="more-1484"></span> insurance company about your medical condition outside of your presence.</p>
<p>Under the Georgia Workers’ Compensation system, the Employer and the insurance company have the power to preselect 6 physicians or facilities to treat your workers’ compensation injury.  You do get to choose which doctor you want to see from that “pre-approved” list or “panel of physicians.”  One physician testified in a deposition that it is very competitive to be on these pre-approved panels.  As you can imagine, the insurance company has the power to remove or place doctors as it sees fit.</p>
<p>Your employer must provide you the list and educate you as to how to use.  If it does not, then you get to choose the doctor.  As the goal is for you to “get better”, it is always best if the injured worker can make an informed decision as to who he or she treats with for the occupational injury.</p>
<p>If you have been hurt at work and need some advice as to your rights under the workers’ compensation system, please contact our office at the Ramos Law Firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/11/12/workers%e2%80%99-compensation-doctors-what%e2%80%99s-the-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does my Employer have workers’ compensation insurance?</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/10/29/does-my-employer-have-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-insurance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/10/29/does-my-employer-have-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-insurance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally, every Georgia Employer with 3 or more employees must carry workers’ compensation insurance.  There are some exceptions <span id="more-1463"></span>for farm laborers, real estate professionals, and such.  Independent contractors are not employees under the workers’ compensation act and therefore, they are not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits.</p>
<p>There is a lot of litigation over whether a person is an “employee” or “independent contractor”.  The Court will consider all the facts surrounding the parties’ work relationship and expectations.  Essentially, the analysis will come down to whether the potential employer had “control and dominion” over the worker.  Some factors include:</p>
<ul>
<li>whether the potential employer controlled the worker’s schedule;</li>
<li>required the worker to wear a uniform;</li>
<li>withheld taxes; and</li>
<li>generally supervised the worker’s daily tasks.</li>
</ul>
<p>If the worker is deemed to have been controlled by the potential employer, the worker would be classified as an employee.  Subsequently, if the employee suffers an injury that arose out of and in the course of employment, then the employee would be entitled to workers’ compensation benefits.  These benefits would include medical benefits as well as weekly income payments if the employee was missing work because of her injury.</p>
<p>While employers are required to carry workers’ compensation insurance, they sometimes do not. If you have been injured on the job and have questions about whether your employer has workers’ compensation insurance, please contact the Ramos Law Firm for a free consultation.  Our workers’ compensation firm is headquartered in Atlanta, Fulton County, we handle matters throughout Georgia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/10/29/does-my-employer-have-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is compensation for permanent partial disability (PPD)?</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/10/27/what-is-compensation-for-permanent-partial-disability-ppd-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/10/27/what-is-compensation-for-permanent-partial-disability-ppd-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injured worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Georgia law defines PPD as a disability partial in character but permanent in quality resulting in a loss or loss of use of body members or from the partial loss of use of the injured employee’s body.  In other words, <span id="more-1465"></span>the PPD rating is a medical assessment of the work injury permanently affecting the injured worker’s range of motion or overall body functioning.</p>
<p>Generally, the PPD rating is issued by the authorized treating physician after the injured employee reaches “maximum medical improvement” where the employee is “about as good as he or she is going to get.”  The physician will make the determination of the PPD rating by using the American Medical Associations’ Guide to Impairment.  This rating will be issued in percentage compared to overall functioning.</p>
<p>Georgia’s Workers’ Compensation Act provides compensation in relation to the physician’s impairment assessment.  This table is found in <a href="http://ramoslawfirm.com/areas-of-practice/georgia-law/94-34-9-263-compensation-for-permanent-partial-disability-.html" target="_blank">O.C.G.A. §34-9-263.</a>  In certain circumstances, doctors may disagree as to the ratings and they can differ.  Also, you may have the option of seeking a second opinion.  If you have any questions about the PPD rating, please contact the Ramos Law Firm at 404-355-3431.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/10/27/what-is-compensation-for-permanent-partial-disability-ppd-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Injured in Thomaston, Georgia</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/10/25/injured-in-thomaston-georgia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/10/25/injured-in-thomaston-georgia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia workers' compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indemnity benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical exam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, we received a phone call regarding an injured worker in Thomaston, Georgia.  He was treated at Upson Regional Medical Center and then he was left on his own for medical treatment.  The hurt worker<span id="more-1475"></span> injured his back and reported it to his supervisor.  However, nothing was done so he “figured” that he was not entitled to additional medical treatment.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this is a common problem.  The workers’ compensation law provides that this injured Thomaston worker is entitled to medical treatment at the Employer/Insurer’s expense.  Moreover, the hurt employee is not limited only to treatment at Upson Regional Medical Center.  If the treatment for the back injury requires specialized treatment, the Employer/Insurer would be responsible for that treatment as well.</p>
<p>In addition, if the employee could not return to work because of his work injury, or even was fired because of his work injury, then the Employer/Insurer would be responsible to pay for the employee’s weekly income benefits.  Unfortunately, these benefits are limited by the “workers’ comp rate” and the injured worker’s “average weekly wage.”  This determination is made on a case by case basis.</p>
<p>If you have been injured on the job and you would like a free consultation, please <a href="mailto:info@ramoslawfirm.com">contact</a> the Ramos Law Firm at (404) 355-3431.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/10/25/injured-in-thomaston-georgia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgia Workers’ Compensation Payments Made in 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/09/19/georgia-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-payments-made-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/09/19/georgia-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-payments-made-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia workers' compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia's injured workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Georgia’s State Board of Workers’ Compensation released a “capsule look” at the 2010 financial information relating to workers’ compensation income and “medical only” benefits paid in 2010. The report was based on<span id="more-1460"></span> the self-reported data provided by self-insureds and insurance companies. The report indicated that:</p>
<ul>
<li>37,167 “new claims” were generated for weekly income benefits.</li>
<li>Over $843 million dollars were paid in indemnity benefits. <em>It is important to note that these payments included indemnity claims generated before 2010.</em></li>
<li>Over 97,000 “medical only” claims were reported. <em>In this situation, the injured worker required medical treatment but did not miss time from work (at least in theory).</em></li>
<li>Over $94 million dollars were paid to medical facilities such as Concentra, Choicecare, occupational and industrial clinics, or various emergency rooms for these “medical only” claims.</li>
<li>Over $674 million dollars were paid out to hospitals and medical facilities in 2010.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you have been injured on the job, call the Ramos Law Firm now for your free consultation. Our workers’ compensation firm is headquartered in Atlanta, Fulton County, and we handle matters throughout Georgia.</p>
<p>Help with your Georgia workers&#8217; compensation claim is only one step away.  Contact us at (404) 355-3431, <a href="mailto:gail@ramoslawfirm.com">via e-mail</a> or our online chat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/09/19/georgia-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-payments-made-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death benefits and Foreign (Alien) Dependents</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/08/10/death-benefits-and-foreign-alien-dependents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/08/10/death-benefits-and-foreign-alien-dependents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work related injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the unfortunate and tragic death caused by a work accident, the deceased employee’s spouse or children may be entitled to workers’ compensation benefits.  O.C.G.A. § 34-9-13.  There was an issue as to whether alien or foreign dependents were limited or excluded from these death benefits.  The Workers’ Compensation Act (prior to 1995) made an unlawful distinction<span id="more-1433"></span> between dependents who are US Citizens and foreign dependents.  Essentially, the law limited the non-resident death benefits to $1,000.    This section of the workers’ compensation code was challenged and the Supreme Court of Georgia struck down provision.  See, Barge-Wagener Construction v. Morales, 263 Ga. 190 (1993), cert denied, 510 U.S. 1003 (1993).</p>
<p>Since then, the workers’ compensation law was amended to delete the distinction between non-resident and resident dependents.  Therefore, issues of citizenship and residency are not relevant or applicable to determining the entitlement of workers’ compensation dependency benefits.  O.C.G.A. § 34-9-265</p>
<p>If you have any questions about death or dependency benefits, please contact the Ramos Law Firm at 404-355-3431.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/08/10/death-benefits-and-foreign-alien-dependents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change of condition; Fictional New Date of Accident</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/07/29/change-of-condition-fictional-new-date-of-accident/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/07/29/change-of-condition-fictional-new-date-of-accident/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O.C.G.A § 34-9-]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Return to Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work related injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens when an employee is hurt on the job, comes back, but then goes back out because of the work injury?  The problem that presents is itself is whether the reason for the disability is a “change of condition” of the previous injury or a “fictional new date of accident”.  The distinction can be confusing and may have an impact on whether the employee has a statute of limitation problem. <span id="more-1421"></span></p>
<p>Generally, a “change in condition” occurs when the injured worker demonstrates a change in the wage-earning capacity, physical condition, or employee status after original injury (established by award or otherwise).  O.C.G.A. § 34-9-104 (a); <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Atlanta Hilton &amp; Towers v. Gaither</span>, 210 Ga. App. 343, 436 S.E.2d 71 (1993). <em>See also </em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Aldrich v. City of Lumber City</span>, 273 Ga. 461, 542 S.E.2d 102 (2001). <em>See </em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">ABB Risk Management Service/Georgia Kaolin v. Lord</span>, 254 Ga. App. 88, 561 S.E.2d 225 (2002).  An injured worker must be careful in these situations as a few statutes of limitations may be triggered for restarting income benefits, or even formally accepting the claim.  <em>See</em>, O.C.G.A. §34-9-104 and 82.</p>
<p>In some cases, an injured employee who sustains a job-related injury may continue to work until her condition forces her to cease work because of gradual worsening of her physical condition.  The Georgia law will generally consider the date she stopped working as a “fictional new date of accident.”  <em>Central State Hospital v. James</em>, 147 Ga. App. 308 (1978).  These fictional new date of accident cases do not involve a new “traumatic” injury.  This scenario is analogous to the “straw that broke the camel’s back” story.</p>
<p>If you have been injured on the job and have recently stopped working, you may be entitled to workers’ compensation benefits.  For a free consultation, please contact the Ramos Law Firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/07/29/change-of-condition-fictional-new-date-of-accident/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If I had a beer shortly before my work injury, am I barred from receiving workers’ compensation benefits?</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/07/26/if-i-had-a-beer-shortly-before-my-work-injury-am-i-barred-from-receiving-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/07/26/if-i-had-a-beer-shortly-before-my-work-injury-am-i-barred-from-receiving-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' Compensation Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally, no compensation is allowed for an injury or death due to an employee’s “willful misconduct.”  O.C.G.A. §34-9-17.   Moreover, if the injury or death of the employee is due to<span id="more-1418"></span> alcohol intoxication or being under the influence of marijuana or other controlled substances, then there may be a “rebuttable presumption” that the injured worker is not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits.</p>
<p>HOWEVER, merely ingesting an intoxicating liquor, even being “under the influence” to a degree is not a complete bar to workers’ compensation benefits.  The injured worker must be able to prove he or she was not “intoxicated” and the alleged “intoxication” was not the legal cause of the injury.</p>
<p>These cases are very technical and fact specific.  Predictably, the workers’ compensation insurance company will likely take a hard line stance in these cases.  However, injured workers can win these cases.  For a free consultation, please contact the Ramos Law Firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/07/26/if-i-had-a-beer-shortly-before-my-work-injury-am-i-barred-from-receiving-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does an injured worker have the right to a second opinion or independent medical evaluation?</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/07/19/does-an-injured-worker-have-the-right-to-a-second-opinion-or-independent-medical-evaluation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/07/19/does-an-injured-worker-have-the-right-to-a-second-opinion-or-independent-medical-evaluation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally, an employee has the right to one independent medical examination with a physician of the injured worker’s choosing.  The doctor must be in Georgia or within 50 miles of the injured worker’s residence.  This second opinion or independent medical evaluation will be<span id="more-1414"></span> at the expense of the Employer and Insurance Company.  However, the second evaluation must take place within 120 days of the injured worker’s receipt of income benefits.  Additionally, written notice of the evaluation must be made in advance of the examination.  The Employer and the Insurance Company&#8217;s liability for repeat diagnostics may be limited to $250.  See, O.C.G.A. §34-9-202</p>
<p>If you have been injured on the job and have received weekly income benefits, you may be eligible for a free second opinion or independent medical examination.  Contact the Ramos Law Firm, if you believe you need assistance in securing this medical right under the Workers’ Compensation Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/07/19/does-an-injured-worker-have-the-right-to-a-second-opinion-or-independent-medical-evaluation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

