<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ramos Law Firm Workers&#039; Comp Blog &#187; Benefits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ramoslawblog.com/category/benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com</link>
	<description>Your Questions about Georgia Workers&#039; Compensation Answered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Teleconference Initiative</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2012/01/31/administrative-law-judge-alj-teleconference-initiative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2012/01/31/administrative-law-judge-alj-teleconference-initiative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change of physician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injured worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Board of Workers' Compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an effort to “expedite” the resolution of certain issues, the State Board of Workers’ Compensation has recently implemented a “conference call” vehicle to assist injured workers and insurers.</p>
<p>Essentially, attorneys may call the Board and request a conference call with the presiding administrative law judge (ALJ) assigned to the claim.  If there is no ALJ assigned to the case, the State Board of Workers’ Compensation will assign a case accordingly.  These ALJ’s are empowered to address the resolution of medical issues or other claims that have NOT been “controverted” by the Employer/Insurer.  The primary purpose of this vehicle is to reach an answer without an evidentiary hearing.  The Board has included issues such as problems obtaining medication prescribed by the authorized treating physician; payment of unpaid medical bills; or accidental suspension of benefits.  The Board also indicated that this conference call vehicle should NOT be used for change of physician requests or other issues where the submission of evidence is required.</p>
<p>If one party requests the conference call, the other party’s participation is mandatory unless otherwise excused by the presiding judge.  Once the conference call is scheduled and the parties are notified via email to initiate the call, failure to participate may result in monetary penalties.  The Board requires 24-hour prior notice and a valid reason to avoid potential sanctions.  The workers’ compensation board “encourages” all parties to work together with the judge’s calendar.</p>
<p>It is the Ramos Law Firm’s hope that this new vehicle will assist injured workers’ in securing prompt medical treatment or resolution of a pending issue in his or her workers’ compensation claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2012/01/31/administrative-law-judge-alj-teleconference-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workers in the automotive industry at risk for more than just blunt trauma injuries</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2012/01/10/workers-in-the-automotive-industry-at-risk-for-more-than-just-blunt-trauma-injuries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2012/01/10/workers-in-the-automotive-industry-at-risk-for-more-than-just-blunt-trauma-injuries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carpal tunnel syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repetitive strain injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers Compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of January 3, 2012, Kia Motors Manufacturing in Georgia indicated that it finished its $100 million expansion to boost annual production.  <strong>Automotive jobs are labor intensive and often dangerous</strong>.  While the obvious, blunt traumatic injury occurring on the job should be covered under workers’ compensation, repetitive motion injuries are also covered under the workers’ compensation system.  For example, <strong>carpal tunnel syndrome or rotator cuff tears are common injuries that autoworkers experience</strong>.  While there is no one “accident” that caused the repetitive injury, the continuous use of the hands or arms may have had a cumulative effect precipitating the injury.  These injuries could also affect the legs and feet.  For example, instead of carpal tunnel syndrome, the injured worker may have “tarsal” tunnel syndrome.</p>
<p>Proving these occupational injuries can be challenging.  In short, the workers’ compensation judges will rely on the medical evidence, the injured workers’ reports to the supervisor or the human resource departments, as well as the type of job the employee had.  Furthermore, the workers’ comp judge will consider how long the employee was working that job.  The longer the injured employee worked the repetitive motion job, the better chances he or she has in proving the claim.</p>
<p>If you have been hurt while working on an assembly line at Kia or any other Georgia employee and you would like a free consultation about your workers’ compensation rights, please contact the Ramos Law Firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2012/01/10/workers-in-the-automotive-industry-at-risk-for-more-than-just-blunt-trauma-injuries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sears Closes Stores</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2012/01/04/sears-closes-stores/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2012/01/04/sears-closes-stores/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 06:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injured worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work related injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sears announced that it will close six Georgia stores as follows: Sears in Macon; Kmart in Atlanta, Buford, Columbus, Douglasville and Jonesboro. Florida will be hit the hardest by the closing of Sears and Kmart stores, losing 11, according to a preliminary list of 79 planned closures released Thursday. Ohio and Michigan have six store closures planned in their states. Tennessee, North Carolina and Minnesota are set to lose four stores each.</p>
<p>In Georgia, we suspect that these closures will produce a substantial amount of lay-offs including employees injured on the job. It is important to note that these injured employees who have been laid off have certain responsibilities before workers’ compensation benefits are started. It is recommended that these injured employees return to their authorized treating physician immediately. This will help certify their work restrictions. Subsequently, we recommend that the laid off and injured workers begin to document a search for employment within the recently certified work restrictions. Additionally, it would be prudent to seek unemployment benefits.</p>
<p>Those Georgia workers’ desiring a free consultation regarding their rights under workers’ compensation should call the Ramos Law Firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2012/01/04/sears-closes-stores/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is compensation for permanent partial disability (PPD)?</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/10/27/what-is-compensation-for-permanent-partial-disability-ppd-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/10/27/what-is-compensation-for-permanent-partial-disability-ppd-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injured worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Georgia law defines PPD as a disability partial in character but permanent in quality resulting in a loss or loss of use of body members or from the partial loss of use of the injured employee’s body.  In other words, <span id="more-1465"></span>the PPD rating is a medical assessment of the work injury permanently affecting the injured worker’s range of motion or overall body functioning.</p>
<p>Generally, the PPD rating is issued by the authorized treating physician after the injured employee reaches “maximum medical improvement” where the employee is “about as good as he or she is going to get.”  The physician will make the determination of the PPD rating by using the American Medical Associations’ Guide to Impairment.  This rating will be issued in percentage compared to overall functioning.</p>
<p>Georgia’s Workers’ Compensation Act provides compensation in relation to the physician’s impairment assessment.  This table is found in <a href="http://ramoslawfirm.com/areas-of-practice/georgia-law/94-34-9-263-compensation-for-permanent-partial-disability-.html" target="_blank">O.C.G.A. §34-9-263.</a>  In certain circumstances, doctors may disagree as to the ratings and they can differ.  Also, you may have the option of seeking a second opinion.  If you have any questions about the PPD rating, please contact the Ramos Law Firm at 404-355-3431.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/10/27/what-is-compensation-for-permanent-partial-disability-ppd-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgia Workers’ Compensation Payments Made in 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/09/19/georgia-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-payments-made-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/09/19/georgia-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-payments-made-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia workers' compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia's injured workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Georgia’s State Board of Workers’ Compensation released a “capsule look” at the 2010 financial information relating to workers’ compensation income and “medical only” benefits paid in 2010. The report was based on<span id="more-1460"></span> the self-reported data provided by self-insureds and insurance companies. The report indicated that:</p>
<ul>
<li>37,167 “new claims” were generated for weekly income benefits.</li>
<li>Over $843 million dollars were paid in indemnity benefits. <em>It is important to note that these payments included indemnity claims generated before 2010.</em></li>
<li>Over 97,000 “medical only” claims were reported. <em>In this situation, the injured worker required medical treatment but did not miss time from work (at least in theory).</em></li>
<li>Over $94 million dollars were paid to medical facilities such as Concentra, Choicecare, occupational and industrial clinics, or various emergency rooms for these “medical only” claims.</li>
<li>Over $674 million dollars were paid out to hospitals and medical facilities in 2010.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you have been injured on the job, call the Ramos Law Firm now for your free consultation. Our workers’ compensation firm is headquartered in Atlanta, Fulton County, and we handle matters throughout Georgia.</p>
<p>Help with your Georgia workers&#8217; compensation claim is only one step away.  Contact us at (404) 355-3431, <a href="mailto:gail@ramoslawfirm.com">via e-mail</a> or our online chat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/09/19/georgia-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-payments-made-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Injured at AirServ?</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/08/12/injured-at-airserv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/08/12/injured-at-airserv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airline Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work related injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Atlanta, many of our employees work the Hartsfield – Jackson International Airport.  Recently, we represented a client who worked for The AirServ Corporation.  AirServ provides cargo, cleaning, security, and ramp handling for the aviation industry.</p>
<p>In our case, an employee was responsible for cleaning the airplane cabins.  As <span id="more-1438"></span>she was being transported to the airplane, the truck was involved in an accident.  As a result, she and two other employees were injured.  The injuries involved pains in her back, neck and head.  She also missed time from work.</p>
<p>Generally,  the Employer/Insurer may control medical treatment if</p>
<ol>
<li>it properly posts a valid panel of physicians, and</li>
<li>it trains its employees as to the use and function of the panel.</li>
</ol>
<p>If it did not do both of these steps, the injured employee may select her own doctor.   Medical treatment is very important to a workers’ compensation case as it provides the best chance for the injured worker to heal from the occupational injury.  Moreover, quality medical treatment provides the best chance for the hurt worker to return to work and regain his or her quality of life.  Sometimes, it appears that the Employee’s “panel” doctors are biased and favor the employer.  Having the power to select your physician is very important.</p>
<p>If you have been hurt at work and believe you have the right to select your physician, please contact the Ramos Law Firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/08/12/injured-at-airserv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death benefits and Foreign (Alien) Dependents</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/08/10/death-benefits-and-foreign-alien-dependents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/08/10/death-benefits-and-foreign-alien-dependents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work related injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the unfortunate and tragic death caused by a work accident, the deceased employee’s spouse or children may be entitled to workers’ compensation benefits.  O.C.G.A. § 34-9-13.  There was an issue as to whether alien or foreign dependents were limited or excluded from these death benefits.  The Workers’ Compensation Act (prior to 1995) made an unlawful distinction<span id="more-1433"></span> between dependents who are US Citizens and foreign dependents.  Essentially, the law limited the non-resident death benefits to $1,000.    This section of the workers’ compensation code was challenged and the Supreme Court of Georgia struck down provision.  See, Barge-Wagener Construction v. Morales, 263 Ga. 190 (1993), cert denied, 510 U.S. 1003 (1993).</p>
<p>Since then, the workers’ compensation law was amended to delete the distinction between non-resident and resident dependents.  Therefore, issues of citizenship and residency are not relevant or applicable to determining the entitlement of workers’ compensation dependency benefits.  O.C.G.A. § 34-9-265</p>
<p>If you have any questions about death or dependency benefits, please contact the Ramos Law Firm at 404-355-3431.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/08/10/death-benefits-and-foreign-alien-dependents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Money benefits in workers’ compensation claims</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/08/04/money-benefits-in-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/08/04/money-benefits-in-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indemnity benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injured worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When an injured worker is not able to return back to work because of his or her work injury, the hurt employee may be deemed “totally disabled.”  Should this occur, the employee hurt at work may be entitled to money benefits under <span id="more-1429"></span>O.C.G.A. § 34-9-261.  The amount of money the employee would be entitled to depends upon his or her average weekly wage.  The law provides that the employee may receive two-thirds of the average weekly wage.  However, the workers’ compensation law provides that the maximum amount the employee may receive on a weekly basis is $500 presuming the injury occurred on or after July 1, 2007.  This is regardless of how much the hurt employee was making.  O.C.G.A. § 34-9-260.</p>
<p>If two-thirds of the average weekly wage amounts to less than $500, the Employer/Insurer must reveal to the State Board of Workers’ Compensation its calculations through a board form WC-6.  Here the Employer/Insurer is obligated to list the employee’s wages for 13 weeks prior to the accident.  Often times, employees hurt on the job simply accept the Employer/Insurer’s calculations.  However, we believe that the injured employee should verify their numbers to determine if the weekly amount of money provided is accurate.</p>
<p>If you have any questions about your average weekly wage or other money benefits you think you may be entitled to, please contact the Ramos Law Firm at 404-355-3431.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/08/04/money-benefits-in-workers%e2%80%99-compensation-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change of condition; Fictional New Date of Accident</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/07/29/change-of-condition-fictional-new-date-of-accident/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/07/29/change-of-condition-fictional-new-date-of-accident/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O.C.G.A § 34-9-]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Return to Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work related injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' comp law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens when an employee is hurt on the job, comes back, but then goes back out because of the work injury?  The problem that presents is itself is whether the reason for the disability is a “change of condition” of the previous injury or a “fictional new date of accident”.  The distinction can be confusing and may have an impact on whether the employee has a statute of limitation problem. <span id="more-1421"></span></p>
<p>Generally, a “change in condition” occurs when the injured worker demonstrates a change in the wage-earning capacity, physical condition, or employee status after original injury (established by award or otherwise).  O.C.G.A. § 34-9-104 (a); <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Atlanta Hilton &amp; Towers v. Gaither</span>, 210 Ga. App. 343, 436 S.E.2d 71 (1993). <em>See also </em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Aldrich v. City of Lumber City</span>, 273 Ga. 461, 542 S.E.2d 102 (2001). <em>See </em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">ABB Risk Management Service/Georgia Kaolin v. Lord</span>, 254 Ga. App. 88, 561 S.E.2d 225 (2002).  An injured worker must be careful in these situations as a few statutes of limitations may be triggered for restarting income benefits, or even formally accepting the claim.  <em>See</em>, O.C.G.A. §34-9-104 and 82.</p>
<p>In some cases, an injured employee who sustains a job-related injury may continue to work until her condition forces her to cease work because of gradual worsening of her physical condition.  The Georgia law will generally consider the date she stopped working as a “fictional new date of accident.”  <em>Central State Hospital v. James</em>, 147 Ga. App. 308 (1978).  These fictional new date of accident cases do not involve a new “traumatic” injury.  This scenario is analogous to the “straw that broke the camel’s back” story.</p>
<p>If you have been injured on the job and have recently stopped working, you may be entitled to workers’ compensation benefits.  For a free consultation, please contact the Ramos Law Firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/07/29/change-of-condition-fictional-new-date-of-accident/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cagle’s to Close Pine Mountain Facility</title>
		<link>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/06/29/cagle%e2%80%99s-to-close-pine-mountain-facility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/06/29/cagle%e2%80%99s-to-close-pine-mountain-facility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injured On the Job in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injured worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poultry farms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramoslawblog.com/?p=1406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poultry workers employed at Cagle’s may be faced with added problems as Cagle’s will eliminate 300 positions at its Pine Mountain Valley, Georgia facility.  It is uncertain if these<span id="more-1406"></span> workers include those who have been injured on the job.  Essentially, these jobs will be primarily the “second shift”.  If the Cagle’s worker’s job is eliminated while he or she is on light or modified duty restrictions, the employee may be entitled to workers’ compensation benefits.   The rate of payment will depend on the worker’s weekly wage.</p>
<p>If you have been injured on the job and desire a free consultation as to your workers’ compensation benefits, please contact the Ramos Law Firm at 404-355-3431.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramoslawblog.com/2011/06/29/cagle%e2%80%99s-to-close-pine-mountain-facility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

